The Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy
The Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy has been working since
1995 to promote effective approaches to international security, disarmament
and arms control. Engaging with governments and civil society, Acronym
provides reporting, analysis and strategic thinking on a range of issues
relevant to peace and security, with special emphasis on treaties and
multilateral initiatives.
The Acronym Institute publishes the journal Disarmament Diplomacy, with comprehensive overview of
news, events and documentation relating to disarmament negotiations and
developments in proliferation.
Founding Director & Editor: Dr Rebecca Johnson
rej@acronym.org.uk
The Acronym Institute is grateful to the Ford
Foundation, the Ploughshares
Fund, and the Joseph Rowntree Charitable
Trust for their enabling support of our work and publications, including
this website.
Highlights
Ex-army and defence chiefs question need to replace Trident
On the third anniversary of their original call for a ‘world free of nuclear weapons’, the ‘Four Horsemen’ speak of the need to maintain confidence in US nuclear infrastructure and weapons
UN Chief Ban Ki Moon tells Conference on Disarmament: 2010 will be an historic year
Bulletin of Atomic Scientists moves ‘Doomsday Clock’ back
China tests missile defence system
In October 2009, Acronym Institute Senior Associate Carol Naughton attended the UN First Committee in New York. Her observations and comments can be read below:
This month's edition of Nuclear Non-Proliferation News includes information
on:
Highlights
British News
International News
Previous editions of Nuclear Non-Proliferation News are available at:
www.acronym.org.uk/news.
Latest analysis from Rebecca Johnson
PrepCom Chair's Recommendations (Drafts)
For further coverage go to Acronym's NPT page.
North Korea is undermining international security with its high risk
nuclear brinkmanship. In conducting its nuclear test, North Korea is playing
a high risk game of nuclear brinkmanship that underscores the global urgency
of bringing the CTBT into force.
North Korea probably hopes to put pressure on the Obama administration
and the Six Party Talks, and increase the price of its denuclearisation
as required by the UN Security Council. This test demonstrates the need
to make the global prohibition on nuclear testing fully binding in international
law. Condemnation is not enough: the US and China have particular responsibility
and must accelerate their own efforts to ratify the CTBT.
180 states have signed the CTBT and 148 have ratified, including Britain,
France and Russia. The treaty cannot enter into force until 9 specified
states ratify, including China and the US.
For further background on North Korea, go
to Acronym's North Korea page.
 |
Published by UNIDIR, Unfinished Business: the Negotiation
of the CTBT and the End of Nuclear Testing, by Rebecca Johnson
details how the CTBT was fought for, opposed and finally negotiated.
It considers how a decade of political and institutional obstacles
have prevented the CTBT from entering into full legal effect, including
the Indian and Pakistani nuclear tests of May 1998, the US failure
to ratify the treaty in 1999, and the October 9, 2006 nuclear test
by North Korea.
|
For more on CTBT go to Acronym's CTBT page.
Acronym Institute Executive Director Dr Rebecca Johnson was part of a
plenary panel on International Expectations of the Obama Administration,
chaired by Naila Bolus of the Ploughshares Fund.
Transcripts, video and audio recordings of the panel are available from
the CEIP website at:
President Obama has reaffirmed his commitment to a world without nuclear
weapons. Obama said that the US would lead the endeavour to eliminate
nuclear weapons, saying that as the only country to have used a nuclear
weapon, it had a 'moral responsibility' to act.
Back to the Top of the Page
© 2010 The Acronym Institute
|